This week in Chicago, at the Democratic National Convention, the Democrat party, espousing the “politics of joy”, decided to have a van performing free abortions outside their convention hall.
We must not forget the overarching sacrament of the open-minded mob cult that gets tangled up with lingering male and female parts. That is women’s (can we say that) “healthcare” in the form of “safe” and effective abortion pills. But we know it was a CHEMICAL solution for having some fun during the run-up to the dopey DNC Gala Soirée. Quite the return to nature by the nature worshippers. And, Beep, Beep, it is FREE. But the chemical partakers in love with nature need to get with the de-sexualization pogrom. That is to get the relics of male and female parts removed. After all, they now have at their disposal (as mandated by the government) precious medical resources diverted away from the now second-class traditional heterosexual population. Equity is wonderful, ea? Perhaps more should go for the ultimate secular religion virtue signal, the “smoothie” or “nullo” option (to eliminate natural pleasure). In its place, mind-altering drugs are readily available to induce mental masturbation. That unnatural chemical abortifacient is a gateway drug to affirmation.
I disagree that if men could get pregnant, "abortion would be a Constitutional right." There is no explicit constitutional right to food, water, shelter, clothing, etc., either. Laws may have evolved differently, but then everything would have been different.
The ages old objection to abortion has nothing to do with sex, but is all about the sanctity of life; it is not about enslaving women to the desires of men, but deeply rooted in religion. The specific taboos of which course would also be very different if both men and women could get pregnant!
This is the strongest defence of the pro-life position that I've seen from anyone. Thank you, Mr. Garrett.
We must not forget the overarching sacrament of the open-minded mob cult that gets tangled up with lingering male and female parts. That is women’s (can we say that) “healthcare” in the form of “safe” and effective abortion pills. But we know it was a CHEMICAL solution for having some fun during the run-up to the dopey DNC Gala Soirée. Quite the return to nature by the nature worshippers. And, Beep, Beep, it is FREE. But the chemical partakers in love with nature need to get with the de-sexualization pogrom. That is to get the relics of male and female parts removed. After all, they now have at their disposal (as mandated by the government) precious medical resources diverted away from the now second-class traditional heterosexual population. Equity is wonderful, ea? Perhaps more should go for the ultimate secular religion virtue signal, the “smoothie” or “nullo” option (to eliminate natural pleasure). In its place, mind-altering drugs are readily available to induce mental masturbation. That unnatural chemical abortifacient is a gateway drug to affirmation.
I disagree that if men could get pregnant, "abortion would be a Constitutional right." There is no explicit constitutional right to food, water, shelter, clothing, etc., either. Laws may have evolved differently, but then everything would have been different.
The ages old objection to abortion has nothing to do with sex, but is all about the sanctity of life; it is not about enslaving women to the desires of men, but deeply rooted in religion. The specific taboos of which course would also be very different if both men and women could get pregnant!